What is the definition of Content based on the platform of social media? Multiple definitions define the content. According to Kontentino, it’s being identified as “any type of information, media, or message shared by users to engage, inform, or entertain their audience”. In another example of a resource for defining the content, according to Law Insider, “Social Media Content means and includes any materials, documents, photographs, graphics and other information that is created, posted, or transmitted using social media.”

There is a theory called Dead Internet Theory. If 90% of the content on social media is made by bots according to Wikipedia, “The dead Internet theory is a conspiracy theory which asserts that since around 2016 the Internet has consisted mainly of bot activity and automatically generated content manipulated by algorithmic curation.”To state the obvious, any AI Content will never claim to be Real for any purpose because Content is made by human minds and times. Why does an AI content creator claim their creation is real, but their content is made by the digital waste of water? Content or Art has always helped humanity to communicate with multiple techniques, like Poetry and more. Creators had each unique style, so the content took time and emotion to make, and included the hatred of criticism that could’ve led them to shame or fear to even interact with other beings. Each Creator makes time to make their content to show the audience. Whenever you see any type of Content, you feel the effort, and the times they’re trying to show the audience from their perspective, the responsibility is to share the information with the viewer that influences growth.  Isn’t Content being posted in social media purposefully for engagement with others?

One of the examples of this type of situation is where there are some old-time Minecraft content creators like PewDiePie or DanTDM willing to put their family ahead and let legacy be put as a legendary, which lets viewers grow up and respect their choice. 

Unfortunately, the creator had chosen the path of AI, like Kwebbelkop, with 15.1 million subscribers (“Don’t watch them or support them”) because all of their content on all of their social media is meaningless AI content. He claimed himself for “not” making money and claimed he is “challenging himself” to make good content. He continues claiming that he loves his job as a content creator to make his videos and claims himself to be more “creative”. I could’ve suggested to him to literally retire, just retire like the legendary YouTuber himself, Matpat, who brings others joy by creating content and collaborating with other artists to make the video more entertaining, passing the reputation to another creator who is as talented as him.

Each Content had always relied on the cooperation with a talented artist to make a continuous masterpiece for the viewer to appreciate the craftsmanship. When creators begin to use AI, it shows the viewer that creators only appreciate the money. 

Conclusion: Social Content Creator, before AI was a thing, was showing the viewer their creativity and being inspired by other creations as a symbol of how much they grow. Sometimes, other creators initially prioritize money by copying other content. At the same time, creators should copy other creators’ creativity with their hands rather than using a machine for less effort they put into it. It’s another way of disrespecting the original creator.